In this detailed comparison, I'll examine the fundamental differences between two advanced language models: DeepSeek-V3 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. These models represent distinct philosophies in AI development, each bringing unique capabilities and design choices to the table.

DeepSeek-V3 distinguishes itself with a sophisticated Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, featuring an impressive 671B total parameters, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet adopts a more controlled approach with its proprietary architecture and strong emphasis on safety and ethical considerations. The differences between these models provide valuable insights into the diverse strategies employed in modern AI development.

Let's examine their core characteristics in detail, from their architectural foundations and performance metrics to their practical applications and deployment strategies, revealing how each model carves its unique position in today's rapidly evolving AI landscape. We'll explore how DeepSeek-V3's open-source nature contrasts with Claude 3.5 Sonnet's managed deployment, and how their respective approaches to training and safety shape their capabilities and use cases.

How to read lengthy and complex technical papers faster and more in-depth? This blog uses rflow.ai to help with analysis.

The ResearchFLow digested version of the DeepSeek-R1 paper is here.

The original paper link is here.

---

Key Differences Between DeepSeek-V3 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Model Architecture

• DeepSeek-V3: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 671B total parameters, 37B activated for each token
• Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Architecture not publicly disclosed, likely a dense model

DeepSeek-V3 uses a sparse MoE architecture, which allows for a very large total parameter count while keeping inference costs lower. Claude 3.5 Sonnet's architecture is not public, but is likely a dense model based on previous Claude versions.

Training Data

• DeepSeek-V3: 14.8T tokens
• Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Training data size not disclosed

DeepSeek-V3 discloses its training data size, while Anthropic does not provide this information for Claude 3.5 Sonnet. The large training dataset for DeepSeek-V3 likely contributes to its strong performance.

Benchmark Performance

MMLU (5-shot)

• DeepSeek-V3: 88.5%
• Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 88.7%

GPQA-Diamond (Pass@1)

• DeepSeek-V3: 59.1%
• Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 65.0%

MATH-500 (EM)

• DeepSeek-V3: 90.2%
• Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 71.1% (0-shot CoT)

Both models show strong performance across various benchmarks, with some variations in specific areas. Claude 3.5 Sonnet appears to have an edge in graduate-level question answering (GPQA), while DeepSeek-V3 shows superior performance in mathematical problem-solving (MATH-500).

Coding Capabilities

HumanEval (Pass@1)

• DeepSeek-V3: 65.2%
• Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 92.0%

SWE-bench Verified (Resolved)

• DeepSeek-V3: 42.0%
• Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 50.8%

Claude 3.5 Sonnet demonstrates superior performance in coding tasks, particularly in the HumanEval benchmark. This suggests that Claude 3.5 Sonnet may have more advanced code generation and understanding capabilities.

Multimodal Capabilities

Claude 3.5 Sonnet has demonstrated strong performance on various vision benchmarks, including:

• MathVista (testmini): 67.7%
• AI2D (test): 94.7%
• ChartQA (test, relaxed accuracy): 90.8%
• DocVQA (test, ANLS score): 95.2%

DeepSeek-V3's technical report does not mention specific multimodal capabilities or benchmarks, suggesting that it may be primarily focused on text-based tasks.

Safety and Ethical Considerations

• Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Extensive safety evaluations conducted, classified as AI Safety Level 2 (ASL-2)
• DeepSeek-V3: Safety considerations mentioned, but less detailed information provided

Anthropic provides more comprehensive information about safety evaluations and ethical considerations for Claude 3.5 Sonnet, including refusal rates for potentially harmful content and collaboration with external safety institutes.

Deployment and Accessibility

• DeepSeek-V3: Open-source model, allowing for more flexible deployment and research use
• Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Closed-source model, accessible through Anthropic's API

The open-source nature of DeepSeek-V3 provides advantages for researchers and developers who want to study or modify the model, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet's deployment is more controlled by Anthropic.

Training Efficiency

• DeepSeek-V3: Emphasizes efficient training techniques, including FP8 mixed precision and optimized frameworks
• Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Training efficiency details not disclosed

DeepSeek-V3's technical report provides extensive information on training optimizations, which may be particularly relevant for researchers interested in large-scale model training techniques.