How Do Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods Evaluate Environmental Effects

Insight from top 10 papers

Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) Methods: Evaluating Environmental Effects

Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) is a crucial phase in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), aiming to understand and quantify the environmental impacts of a product, process, or service throughout its entire life cycle (S, 2024). LCA follows ISO 14040/14044 standards and consists of four main phases: goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, impact assessment, and interpretation (S, 2024). LCIA helps in identifying the most significant environmental burdens and provides a basis for informed decision-making.

LCIA Process

The LCIA process involves several steps to translate Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) data into meaningful environmental impact scores (Kowalska et al., 2020). These steps include:

  1. Classification: Assigning LCI results (elementary flows) to specific impact categories (e.g., global warming, acidification) (Kowalska et al., 2020).
  2. Characterization: Calculating the magnitude of the impact category indicator based on the classified LCI results and characterization factors. Characterization factors quantify the contribution of a unit of elementary flow to the impact category indicator (e.g., kg CO2 eq for global warming) (Kowalska et al., 2020).
  3. Normalization (Optional): Scaling the impact category indicator results relative to a reference value (e.g., total impact in a region or per capita impact) to provide context and allow for comparison across different impact categories (Kowalska et al., 2020).
  4. Weighting (Optional): Assigning weights to different impact categories based on their relative importance, reflecting value judgments and societal priorities. This step allows for aggregation of impact category indicator results into a single score (Kowalska et al., 2020).
  5. Interpretation: Analyzing and interpreting the LCIA results to identify significant impact categories, hotspots in the life cycle, and opportunities for improvement (Kowalska et al., 2020).

Midpoint vs. Endpoint Approaches

LCIA methods can be categorized into midpoint and endpoint approaches:

  • Midpoint Indicators: Focus on single environmental problems at a point along the cause-effect chain between emissions and ultimate environmental damage. Examples include global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), and eutrophication potential (EP) (Rapa et al., 2020).
  • Endpoint Indicators: Assess the ultimate impacts on areas of protection, such as human health, ecosystem quality, and resource availability. Endpoint methods aggregate midpoint indicators to provide a more comprehensive view of environmental damage (Rapa et al., 2020).

Example: ReCiPe Method

The ReCiPe method is a widely used LCIA method that includes both midpoint and endpoint indicators (S, 2024). ReCiPe 2016 midpoint involves several impact categories dealing with air, water, land, and human health (Rapa et al., 2020). The ReCiPe 2016 endpoint method assesses three endpoint indicators: Human Health, Ecosystems, and Resources (Rapa et al., 2020).

Common LCIA Methods

Several LCIA methods are commonly used in practice, each with its own strengths and limitations:

  • ReCiPe: A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level (Rapa et al., 2020).
  • CML-IA: A problem-oriented method developed by the University of Leiden (CML) (Rapa et al., 2020).
  • IMPACT 2002+: Links LCI data to several midpoint and damage categories (Rapa et al., 2020).
  • ILCD 2011: The International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) method (Rapa et al., 2020).
  • EPD (2013): Used for Environmental Product Declarations (Rapa et al., 2020).
  • Eco-indicator 99: A damage-oriented method widely used and recognized in Europe (Gámez-García et al., 2015).

Different methods can yield heterogeneous results, as demonstrated in a study comparing midpoint methods for electricity sources (Rapa et al., 2020). For example, ILCD 2011 may underestimate values for certain impact categories (Rapa et al., 2020).

Impact Categories

LCIA methods evaluate a wide range of environmental effects, which are grouped into impact categories. Some common impact categories include:

  • Global Warming: Measures the contribution to climate change, typically expressed in kg CO2 equivalents (Rapa et al., 2020).
  • Acidification: Measures the potential to cause acid rain and soil acidification, typically expressed in kg SO2 equivalents (Rapa et al., 2020).
  • Eutrophication: Measures the potential to cause excessive nutrient enrichment in water bodies, leading to algal blooms and oxygen depletion, typically expressed in kg PO4 equivalents (Yan et al., 2023).
  • Ozone Depletion: Measures the potential to deplete the stratospheric ozone layer, typically expressed in kg CFC-11 equivalents (Rapa et al., 2020).
  • Particulate Matter Formation: Measures the formation of fine particulate matter, which can cause respiratory problems, typically expressed in kg PM2.5 equivalents (Rapa et al., 2020).
  • Human Toxicity: Measures the potential for substances to cause adverse health effects in humans (S, 2024).
  • Ecotoxicity: Measures the potential for substances to cause adverse effects in ecosystems.
  • Resource Depletion: Measures the depletion of natural resources, such as fossil fuels and minerals (S, 2024).
  • Land Use: Measures the impact of land occupation and transformation on biodiversity and ecosystem services (S, 2024).

Software Tools for LCIA

Several software tools are available to facilitate LCA and LCIA calculations (Kowalska et al., 2020). These tools provide databases of LCI data, implement various LCIA methods, and offer features for data analysis and visualization. Examples include:

  • SimaPro: A widely used LCA software (Rapa et al., 2020).
  • GaBi: Another popular LCA software (Kowalska et al., 2020).
  • Umberto: An LCA software with a focus on material flow analysis (Kowalska et al., 2020).
  • openLCA: An open-source LCA software (Kowalska et al., 2020).
  • LCA Manager: A tool for environmental assessment based on the methodology of LCA (Gámez-García et al., 2015).

Interpretation and Improvement

The final stage of LCIA involves interpreting the results and identifying opportunities for improvement. This may involve:

  • Sensitivity Analysis: Assessing the impact of uncertainties in the LCI data and LCIA method on the results.
  • Contribution Analysis: Identifying the processes or materials that contribute most to the environmental impacts.
  • Scenario Analysis: Evaluating the potential environmental benefits of alternative product designs, production processes, or end-of-life scenarios.

By understanding the environmental effects of a product or service, LCIA can inform decision-making and promote more sustainable practices.

Source Papers (10)
LCA as comparative tool for concrete columns and glulam columns
Prioritizing Consumption‐Based Carbon Policy Based on the Evaluation of Mitigation Potential Using Input‐Output Methods
Accounting for effects of carbon flows in LCA of biomass-based products—exploration and evaluation of a selection of existing methods
Potential mitigation of environmental impacts of intensive plum production in southeast China with maintenance of high yields: Evaluation using life cycle assessment
Environmental sustainability analysis of dairy bedding regeneration system based on emergy evaluation and life cycle assessment methods
Development of an Assessment Method for Evaluation of Sustainable Factories
Multi-objective performance assessment of wastewater treatment plants combining plant-wide process models and life cycle assessment
Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Electric Vehicles: Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing Evaluation of Electricity Sources
Assessing the Viability of Sustainable Aviation Fuel Decarbonisation: Environmental and Economic Sustainability
Methods and tools for environmental technologies risk evaluation: the principal guidelines—a review